Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Memory outperforms the cheaper Megaport on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck!
Advantages of Memory PC
- Performs up to 100% better in Total War: WARHAMMER III than Megaport - 96 vs 48 FPS
- Up to 22% better value when playing Total War: WARHAMMER III than Megaport - €14.89 vs €19.15 per FPS
Advantages of Megaport Gaming PC
- Up to 36% cheaper than Memory - €919.00 vs €1429.00
Total War: WARHAMMER III
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for €1,429 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 438 minutes ago
Buy for €919 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 438 minutes ago
Trending Games
Using the selected game parameters
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
198th Variation
2nd Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
198th Variation
Radeon RX 6950 XT
16 GB GDDR6 | 256-bit
Pixel Fillrate
295.7 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
739.2 GTexel/s
100%
2nd Variation
GeForce RTX 4060
8 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
118.1 GPixel/s
40%
Texel Fillrate
236.2 GTexel/s
32%
GPU Winner
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
2nd Variation
Ryzen 5 5600
3.5 GHz | 6-core
Single-Core
2029
100%
Multi-Core
8539
100%
CPU Winner
Memory PC | vs | Megaport Gaming PC |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
| Core i5-10600KF | CPU | Ryzen 5 5600 |
| Radeon RX 6950 XT | GPU | GeForce RTX 4060 |
32 GB | RAM | 16 GB |
| 512 GB SSD + 2 TB HDD | Storage | N/A Storage |
