Key Differences
In short — Memory outperforms the cheaper ERAZER Engineer X30 High-End on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing ERAZER Engineer X30 High-End is a better bang for your buck.
Advantages of Memory PC
- Performs up to 2% better in World of Tanks than ERAZER Engineer X30 High-End - 385 vs 376 FPS
Advantages of ERAZER Engineer X30 High-End Gaming Desktop PC
- Up to 11% cheaper than Memory - €1699.95 vs €1909.0
- Up to 9% better value when playing World of Tanks than Memory - €4.52 vs €4.96 per FPS
World of Tanks
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
195th Variation
FPS
385
100%
Value, €/FPS
€4.96/FPS
91.12903225806451%
Price, €
€1909
89%
FPS Winner
Buy for €1,909 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2429 minutes ago
3rd Variation
FPS
376
97.66233766233766%
Value, €/FPS
€4.52/FPS
100%
Price, €
€1699.95
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €1,699.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3202 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
195th Variation
3rd Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
195th Variation
Radeon RX 6950 XT
16 GB | System-Shared
Pixel Fillrate
295.7 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
739.2 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
3rd Variation
GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER
12 GB | System-Shared
Pixel Fillrate
198 GPixel/s
66.95975650997633%
Texel Fillrate
554.4 GTexel/s
74.99999999999999%
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
3rd Variation
Core i7-14700F
null-core
Single-Core
2775
97.7112676056338%
Multi-Core
17332
98.41576287547555%
Memory PC | vs | ERAZER Engineer X30 High-End Gaming Desktop PC |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
| Core i7-13700K | CPU | Core i7-14700F |
| Radeon RX 6950 XT | GPU | GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER |
| 16 GB | RAM | 16 GB |
| N/A Storage | Storage | 2 TB SSD |
