Key Differences
In short — Megaport outperforms the cheaper Memory on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Memory is a better bang for your buck.
Advantages of Memory PC
- Up to 3% cheaper than Megaport - €1789.0 vs €1849.0
- Up to 1% better value when playing Monster Hunter: World than Megaport - €9.04 vs €9.11 per FPS
Advantages of Megaport PC
- Performs up to 3% better in Monster Hunter: World than Memory - 203 vs 198 FPS
Monster Hunter: World
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Buy for €1,789 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 433 minutes ago
Buy for €1,849 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 417 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
194th Variation
2nd Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
194th Variation
Radeon RX 6950 XT
16 GB GDDR6 | 256-bit
Pixel Fillrate
295.7 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
739.2 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
2nd Variation
GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER
12 GB GDDR6X | 192-bit
Pixel Fillrate
198 GPixel/s
66%
Texel Fillrate
554.4 GTexel/s
74%
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
2nd Variation
Core i7-14700KF
3.4 GHz | 20-core
Single-Core
2975
100%
Multi-Core
19234
100%
CPU Winner
Memory PC | vs | Megaport PC |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
| Core i5-13600K | CPU | Core i7-14700KF |
| Radeon RX 6950 XT | GPU | GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER |
32 GB | RAM | 16 GB |
| 512 GB SSD + 2 TB HDD | Storage | N/A Storage |
