Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Memory outperforms GameMachines Cube - on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck!
Advantages of Memory PC
- Performs up to 22% better in Dirt 5 than GameMachines Cube - - 190 vs 156 FPS
- Up to 18% better value when playing Dirt 5 than GameMachines Cube - - €8.94 vs €10.89 per FPS
Dirt 5
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Buy for €1,699 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74863 minutes ago
1st Variation
FPS
156
82.10526315789474%
Value, €/FPS
€10.89/FPS
82.09366391184571%
Price, €
€1699
100%
Buy for €1,699 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74857 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
194th Variation
1st Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
194th Variation
Radeon RX 6950 XT
16 GB GDDR6 | 256-bit
Pixel Fillrate
295.7 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
739.2 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
1st Variation
GeForce RTX 4070
12 GB GDDR6X | 192-bit
Pixel Fillrate
158.4 GPixel/s
53.56780520798107%
Texel Fillrate
455.4 GTexel/s
61.60714285714285%
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
194th Variation
Core i5-13600K
3.5 GHz | 14-core
Single-Core
2665
100%
Multi-Core
14848
100%
CPU Winner
1st Variation
Core i7-12700F
2.1 GHz | 12-core
Single-Core
2362
88.63039399624766%
Multi-Core
11527
77.63335129310344%
Memory PC | vs | GameMachines Cube - Gaming PC |
---|---|---|
Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
Core i5-13600K | CPU | Core i7-12700F |
Radeon RX 6950 XT | GPU | GeForce RTX 4070 |
32 GB | RAM | 16 GB |
512 GB SSD + 2 TB HDD | Storage | N/A Storage |