Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Memory outperforms the more expensive Captiva on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck!
Advantages of Memory PC
- Performs up to 8% better in Valorant than Captiva - 838 vs 773 FPS
- Up to 10% cheaper than Captiva - €1789.0 vs €1989.0
- Up to 17% better value when playing Valorant than Captiva - €2.13 vs €2.57 per FPS
Valorant
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Buy for €1,789 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 26 minutes ago
Buy for €1,989 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 15 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
194th Variation
4th Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
194th Variation
Radeon RX 6950 XT
16 GB GDDR6 | 256-bit
Pixel Fillrate
295.7 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
739.2 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
4th Variation
GeForce RTX 4070
12 GB GDDR6X | 192-bit
Pixel Fillrate
158.4 GPixel/s
53%
Texel Fillrate
455.4 GTexel/s
61%
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
194th Variation
Core i5-13600K
3.5 GHz | 14-core
Single-Core
2665
100%
Multi-Core
14848
99%
CPU Winner
Memory PC | vs | Captiva PC |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
| Core i5-13600K | CPU | Core i9-12900KF |
| Radeon RX 6950 XT | GPU | GeForce RTX 4070 |
| 32 GB | RAM | 64 GB |
| 512 GB SSD + 2 TB HDD | Storage | N/A Storage |
