Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Memory outperforms the cheaper Megaport on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck!
Advantages of Memory PC
- Performs up to 16% better in Counter-Strike 2 than Megaport - 428 vs 370 FPS
- Up to 5% better value when playing Counter-Strike 2 than Megaport - €4.02 vs €4.21 per FPS
Advantages of Megaport Gaming PC
- Up to 9% cheaper than Memory - €1559.00 vs €1719.00
Counter-Strike 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Buy for €1,719 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 383 minutes ago
Buy for €1,559 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 379 minutes ago
Trending Games
Using the selected game parameters
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
193rd Variation
22nd Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
193rd Variation
Radeon RX 6950 XT
16 GB GDDR6 | 256-bit
Pixel Fillrate
295.7 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
739.2 GTexel/s
100%
22nd Variation
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB
16 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
121.7 GPixel/s
41%
Texel Fillrate
344.8 GTexel/s
47%
GPU Winner
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
22nd Variation
Core i9-12900F
2.4 GHz | 16-core
Single-Core
2539
100%
Multi-Core
13890
100%
CPU Winner
Memory PC | vs | Megaport Gaming PC |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
| Core i7-12700K | CPU | Core i9-12900F |
| Radeon RX 6950 XT | GPU | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB |
| 32 GB | RAM | 32 GB |
| 512 GB SSD + 2 TB HDD | Storage | N/A Storage |
