Key Differences
In short — Megaport outperforms Memory on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both PC Builds to compare value.
Advantages of Megaport Gaming PC
- Performs up to 160% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Memory - 148 vs 57 FPS
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Currently Out of Stock
Out of Stock
Updated 8811 minutes ago
50th Variation
FPS
148
100%
Value, €/FPS
€11.82/FPS
100%
Price, €
€1749
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €1,749 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 8799 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
125th Variation
50th Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
125th Variation
GeForce GTX 1660
6 GB GDDR5 | 192-bit
Pixel Fillrate
85.68 GPixel/s
43%
Texel Fillrate
157.1 GTexel/s
28%
50th Variation
GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER
12 GB GDDR6X | 192-bit
Pixel Fillrate
198 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
554.4 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
50th Variation
Ryzen 9 5900X
3.7 GHz | 12-core
Single-Core
2179
100%
Multi-Core
11883
100%
CPU Winner
Memory PC | vs | Megaport Gaming PC |
---|---|---|
Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
Ryzen 7 5700X | CPU | Ryzen 9 5900X |
GeForce GTX 1660 | GPU | GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER |
16 GB | RAM | 64 GB |
240 GB SSD | Storage | N/A Storage |