Key Differences
In short — Memory outperforms the cheaper Kiebel on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Kiebel is a better bang for your buck.
Advantages of Memory PC
- Performs up to 6% better in World of Tanks than Kiebel - 390 vs 367 FPS
Advantages of Kiebel Gaming PC
- Up to 6% cheaper than Memory - €1899.0 vs €2019.0
- Up to 0% better value when playing World of Tanks than Memory - €5.17 vs €5.18 per FPS
World of Tanks
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for €2,019 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 289 minutes ago
14th Variation
FPS
367
94.1025641025641%
Value, €/FPS
€5.17/FPS
100%
Price, €
€1899
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €1,899 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 276 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
190th Variation
14th Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
190th Variation
Radeon RX 6950 XT
16 GB GDDR6 | 256-bit
Pixel Fillrate
295.7 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
739.2 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
14th Variation
GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER
12 GB GDDR6X | 192-bit
Pixel Fillrate
198 GPixel/s
66.95975650997633%
Texel Fillrate
554.4 GTexel/s
74.99999999999999%
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
190th Variation
Core i9-13900K
3.0 GHz | 24-core
Single-Core
2974
100%
Multi-Core
20148
100%
CPU Winner
14th Variation
Core i9-12900KF
3.2 GHz | 16-core
Single-Core
2542
85.47410894418292%
Multi-Core
14881
73.85844748858447%
Memory PC | vs | Kiebel Gaming PC |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
| Core i9-13900K | CPU | Core i9-12900KF |
| Radeon RX 6950 XT | GPU | GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER |
| 16 GB | RAM | 64 GB |
| N/A Storage | Storage | N/A Storage |
