Key Differences
In short — Kiebel outperforms Memory on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both PC Builds to compare value.
Advantages of Kiebel Gaming PC
- Performs up to 118% better in The Last of Us Part I than Memory - 87 vs 40 FPS
The Last of Us Part I
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Currently Out of Stock
Out of Stock
Updated 265 minutes ago
10th Variation
FPS
87
100%
Value, €/FPS
€17.23/FPS
100%
Price, €
€1499
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €1,499 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 811 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
121st Variation
10th Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
121st Variation
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti
6 GB GDDR6 | 192-bit
Pixel Fillrate
84.96 GPixel/s
43%
Texel Fillrate
169.9 GTexel/s
31%
GPU Winner
10th Variation
GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER
12 GB GDDR6X | 192-bit
Pixel Fillrate
198 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
554.4 GTexel/s
100%
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
121st Variation
Core i7-13700K
3.4 GHz | 16-core
Single-Core
2840
100%
Multi-Core
17611
100%
CPU Winner
Memory PC | vs | Kiebel Gaming PC |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
| Core i7-13700K | CPU | Ryzen 9 5900X |
| GeForce GTX 1660 Ti | GPU | GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER |
| 32 GB | RAM | 32 GB |
| 512 GB SSD + 2 TB HDD | Storage | 1 TB SSD |
