Key Differences
In short — Megaport outperforms the cheaper Memory on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Memory is a better bang for your buck.
Advantages of Memory PC
- Up to 35% cheaper than Megaport - €899.00 vs €1379.00
- Up to 4% better value when playing Counter-Strike 2 than Megaport - €3.62 vs €3.77 per FPS
Advantages of Megaport Gaming PC
- Performs up to 48% better in Counter-Strike 2 than Memory - 366 vs 248 FPS
Counter-Strike 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Buy for €899 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 182 minutes ago
Buy for €1,379 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 173 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
185th Variation
32nd Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
185th Variation
Radeon RX 6500 XT
4 GB GDDR6 | 64-bit
Pixel Fillrate
90.08 GPixel/s
45%
Texel Fillrate
180.2 GTexel/s
33%
GPU Winner
32nd Variation
GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER
12 GB GDDR6X | 192-bit
Pixel Fillrate
198 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
554.4 GTexel/s
100%
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
185th Variation
Core i9-11900F
2.5 GHz | 8-core
Single-Core
2171
100%
Multi-Core
9171
94%
CPU Winner
Memory PC | vs | Megaport Gaming PC |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
| Core i9-11900F | CPU | Ryzen 7 5700X |
| Radeon RX 6500 XT | GPU | GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER |
| 32 GB | RAM | 32 GB |
| 512 GB SSD + 2 TB HDD | Storage | N/A Storage |
