Key Differences
In short — Megaport outperforms Memory on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both PC Builds to compare value.
Advantages of Megaport Gaming PC
- Performs up to 193% better in Starfield than Memory - 41 vs 14 FPS
Starfield
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Currently Out of Stock
Out of Stock
Updated 8635 minutes ago
4th Variation
FPS
41
100%
Value, €/FPS
€31.68/FPS
100%
Price, €
€1299
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €1,299 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 8631 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
116th Variation
4th Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
116th Variation
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti
6 GB GDDR6 | 192-bit
Pixel Fillrate
84.96 GPixel/s
54%
Texel Fillrate
169.9 GTexel/s
37%
4th Variation
GeForce RTX 4070
12 GB GDDR6X | 192-bit
Pixel Fillrate
158.4 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
455.4 GTexel/s
100%
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
Memory PC | vs | Megaport Gaming PC |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
| Core i9-11900F | CPU | Ryzen 7 5700X |
| GeForce GTX 1660 Ti | GPU | GeForce RTX 4070 |
32 GB | RAM | 16 GB |
| 512 GB SSD + 2 TB HDD | Storage | N/A Storage |
