Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Megaport outperforms the cheaper Memory on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck!
Advantages of Memory PC
- Up to 9% cheaper than Megaport - €2239.0 vs €2449.0
Advantages of Megaport Gaming PC
- Performs up to 19% better in The Last of Us Part I than Memory - 120 vs 101 FPS
- Up to 8% better value when playing The Last of Us Part I than Memory - €20.41 vs €22.17 per FPS
The Last of Us Part I
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
160th Variation
FPS
101
84.16666666666667%
Value, €/FPS
€22.17/FPS
92.06134415877311%
Price, €
€2239
100%
Buy for €2,239 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1735 minutes ago
12th Variation
FPS
120
100%
Value, €/FPS
€20.41/FPS
100%
Price, €
€2449
91%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €2,449 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1728 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
160th Variation
12th Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
160th Variation
GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
12 GB | System-Shared
Pixel Fillrate
208.8 GPixel/s
74.4119743406985%
Texel Fillrate
626.4 GTexel/s
82.25869993434011%
12th Variation
GeForce RTX 4080
16 GB | System-Shared
Pixel Fillrate
280.6 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
761.5 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
12th Variation
Ryzen 9 7950X
null-core
Single-Core
2938
98.78950907868192%
Multi-Core
19293
95.7564026206075%
Memory PC | vs | Megaport Gaming PC |
---|---|---|
Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
Core i9-13900K | CPU | Ryzen 9 7950X |
GeForce RTX 4070 Ti | GPU | GeForce RTX 4080 |
16 GB | RAM | 32 GB |
N/A Storage | Storage | N/A Storage |