Key Differences
In short — Memory outperforms the cheaper ACEMAGIC Mini on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing ACEMAGIC Mini is a better bang for your buck.
Advantages of Memory PC
- Performs up to 178% better in Baldur's Gate 3 than ACEMAGIC Mini - 100 vs 36 FPS
Advantages of ACEMAGIC Mini PC
- Up to 66% cheaper than Memory - €699.0 vs €2039.0
- Up to 5% better value when playing Baldur's Gate 3 than Memory - €19.42 vs €20.39 per FPS
Baldur's Gate 3
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
159th Variation
FPS
100
100%
Value, €/FPS
€20.39/FPS
95.24276606179501%
Price, €
€2039
34%
FPS Winner
Buy for €2,039 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 75421 minutes ago
Buy for €699 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 75410 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
159th Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
159th Variation
GeForce RTX 4070
12 GB GDDR6X | 192-bit
Pixel Fillrate
158.4 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
455.4 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
Radeon 780M
System-Shared | System-Shared
Pixel Fillrate
92.8 GPixel/s
58.58585858585859%
Texel Fillrate
139.2 GTexel/s
30.566534914361%
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
159th Variation
Core i9-13900K
3.0 GHz | 24-core
Single-Core
2974
100%
Multi-Core
20148
100%
CPU Winner
Memory PC | vs | ACEMAGIC Mini PC |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
| Core i9-13900K | CPU | Ryzen 7 7840HS |
| GeForce RTX 4070 | GPU | Radeon 780M |
| 32 GB | RAM | 32 GB |
| 512 GB SSD + 2 TB HDD | Storage | N/A Storage |
