Key Differences
In short — Captiva outperforms the cheaper Memory on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Memory is a better bang for your buck.
Advantages of Memory PC
- Up to 21% cheaper than Captiva - €1499.00 vs €1889.00
- Up to 16% better value when playing War Thunder than Captiva - €6.72 vs €7.97 per FPS
Advantages of Captiva PC
- Performs up to 6% better in War Thunder than Memory - 237 vs 223 FPS
War Thunder
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
Buy for €1,499 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 5241 minutes ago
Buy for €1,889 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 5233 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
93rd Variation
4th Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
93rd Variation
Radeon RX 6500 XT
4 GB GDDR6 | 64-bit
Pixel Fillrate
90.08 GPixel/s
57%
Texel Fillrate
180.2 GTexel/s
40%
GPU Winner
4th Variation
GeForce RTX 4070
12 GB GDDR6X | 192-bit
Pixel Fillrate
158.4 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
455.4 GTexel/s
100%
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
93rd Variation
Core i9-13900K
3.0 GHz | 24-core
Single-Core
2991
100%
Multi-Core
20110
100%
CPU Winner
Memory PC | vs | Captiva PC |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
| Core i9-13900K | CPU | Core i9-12900KF |
| Radeon RX 6500 XT | GPU | GeForce RTX 4070 |
| 32 GB | RAM | 64 GB |
| 512 GB SSD + 2 TB HDD | Storage | N/A Storage |
