Key Differences
In short — Megaport outperforms Memory on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both PC Builds to compare value.
Advantages of Megaport Gaming PC
- Performs up to 137% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Memory - 147 vs 62 FPS
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Currently Out of Stock
Out of Stock
Updated 564 minutes ago
32nd Variation
FPS
147
100%
Value, €/FPS
€9.38/FPS
100%
Price, €
€1379
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €1,379 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 553 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
87th Variation
32nd Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
87th Variation
GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER
6 GB GDDR6 | 192-bit
Pixel Fillrate
85.68 GPixel/s
43%
Texel Fillrate
157.1 GTexel/s
28%
GPU Winner
32nd Variation
GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER
12 GB GDDR6X | 192-bit
Pixel Fillrate
198 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
554.4 GTexel/s
100%
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
Memory PC | vs | Megaport Gaming PC |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
| Core i9-11900 | CPU | Ryzen 7 5700X |
| GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER | GPU | GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER |
| 16 GB | RAM | 32 GB |
| 512 GB SSD | Storage | N/A Storage |
