Key Differences
In short — Captiva outperforms the cheaper Memory on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Memory is a better bang for your buck.
Advantages of Memory PC
- Up to 57% cheaper than Captiva - €999.0 vs €2339.0
- Up to 30% better value when playing Minecraft than Captiva - €1.94 vs €2.77 per FPS
Advantages of Captiva PC
- Performs up to 63% better in Minecraft than Memory - 843 vs 516 FPS
Minecraft
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Buy for €999 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 8420 minutes ago
Buy for €2,339 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 640 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
122nd Variation
6th Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
122nd Variation
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti
6 GB GDDR6 | 192-bit
Pixel Fillrate
84.96 GPixel/s
40%
Texel Fillrate
169.9 GTexel/s
27%
6th Variation
GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
12 GB GDDR6X | 192-bit
Pixel Fillrate
208.8 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
626.4 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
6th Variation
Core i7-14700KF
3.4 GHz | 20-core
Single-Core
2975
100%
Multi-Core
19234
100%
CPU Winner
Memory PC | vs | Captiva PC |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
| Core i9-11900 | CPU | Core i7-14700KF |
| GeForce GTX 1660 Ti | GPU | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti |
| 32 GB | RAM | 64 GB |
| 512 GB SSD + 2 TB HDD | Storage | N/A Storage |
