Key Differences
In short — Megaport outperforms Memory on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both PC Builds to compare value.
Advantages of Megaport Gaming PC
- Performs up to 108% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Memory - 108 vs 52 FPS
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Currently Out of Stock
Out of Stock
Updated 280 minutes ago
30th Variation
FPS
108
100%
Value, €/FPS
€12.95/FPS
100%
Price, €
€1399
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €1,399 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 272 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
119th Variation
30th Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
119th Variation
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti
6 GB GDDR6 | 192-bit
Pixel Fillrate
84.96 GPixel/s
70%
Texel Fillrate
169.9 GTexel/s
49%
30th Variation
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB
16 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
121.7 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
344.8 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
30th Variation
Ryzen 9 5900X
3.7 GHz | 12-core
Single-Core
2179
100%
Multi-Core
11883
100%
CPU Winner
Memory PC | vs | Megaport Gaming PC |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
| Core i7-10700F | CPU | Ryzen 9 5900X |
| GeForce GTX 1660 Ti | GPU | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB |
| 16 GB | RAM | 32 GB |
| 240 GB SSD + 2 TB HDD | Storage | N/A Storage |
