Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Megaport outperforms the more expensive Memory on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck!
Advantages of Megaport Gaming PC
- Performs up to 36% better in Starfield than Memory - 19 vs 14 FPS
- Up to 6% cheaper than Memory - €899.0 vs €959.0
- Up to 31% better value when playing Starfield than Memory - €47.32 vs €68.5 per FPS
Starfield
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for €959 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 488 minutes ago
18th Variation
FPS
19
100%
Value, €/FPS
€47.32/FPS
100%
Price, €
€899
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €899 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 491 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
116th Variation
18th Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
116th Variation
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti
6 GB GDDR6 | 192-bit
Pixel Fillrate
84.96 GPixel/s
99%
Texel Fillrate
169.9 GTexel/s
85%
18th Variation
GeForce RTX 3060
12 GB GDDR6 | 192-bit
Pixel Fillrate
85.3 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
199 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
116th Variation
Core i9-11900F
2.5 GHz | 8-core
Single-Core
2171
100%
Multi-Core
9171
94%
CPU Winner
Memory PC | vs | Megaport Gaming PC |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
| Core i9-11900F | CPU | Ryzen 7 5700X |
| GeForce GTX 1660 Ti | GPU | GeForce RTX 3060 |
32 GB | RAM | 16 GB |
| 512 GB SSD + 2 TB HDD | Storage | N/A Storage |
