Key Differences
In short — Captiva outperforms Memory on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both PC Builds to compare value.
Advantages of Captiva PC
- Performs up to 67% better in Halo Infinite than Memory - 105 vs 63 FPS
Halo Infinite
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Captiva PC Highend Gaming I79-337 | Intel Core i9-12900KF | Mainboard B660M | 64GB DDR4 RAM | RTX 4070 12GB GDDR6X | 2TB M.2 SSD | Windows 11 Home
Buy for €1,889 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1912 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Memory PC
52nd Variation
Captiva PC
4th Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
Memory PC
52nd Variation
Radeon RX 6650 XT
8 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
168.6 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
337.3 GTexel/s
74%
Captiva PC
4th Variation
GeForce RTX 4070
12 GB GDDR6X | 192-bit
Pixel Fillrate
158.4 GPixel/s
94%
Texel Fillrate
455.4 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
Captiva PC
4th Variation
Core i9-12900KF
3.2 GHz | 16-core
Single-Core
2542
100%
Multi-Core
14881
100%
CPU Winner
Memory PC | vs | Captiva PC |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
| Ryzen 5 5500 | CPU | Core i9-12900KF |
| Radeon RX 6650 XT | GPU | GeForce RTX 4070 |
| 16 GB | RAM | 64 GB |
| 240 GB SSD + 1 TB HDD | Storage | N/A Storage |
