Key Differences
In short — Captiva outperforms Memory on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both PC Builds to compare value.
Advantages of Captiva PC
- Performs up to 27% better in Battlefield V than Memory - 210 vs 165 FPS
Battlefield V
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Captiva PC Highend Gaming I79-337 | Intel Core i9-12900KF | Mainboard B660M | 64GB DDR4 RAM | RTX 4070 12GB GDDR6X | 2TB M.2 SSD | Windows 11 Home
Buy for €1,889 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 360 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Memory PC
50th Variation
Captiva PC
4th Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
Memory PC
50th Variation
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB
16 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
121.7 GPixel/s
77%
Texel Fillrate
344.8 GTexel/s
76%
Captiva PC
4th Variation
GeForce RTX 4070
12 GB GDDR6X | 192-bit
Pixel Fillrate
158.4 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
455.4 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
Captiva PC
4th Variation
Core i9-12900KF
3.2 GHz | 16-core
Single-Core
2608
100%
Multi-Core
15118
100%
CPU Winner
Memory PC | vs | Captiva PC |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
| Ryzen 5 5600X | CPU | Core i9-12900KF |
| GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB | GPU | GeForce RTX 4070 |
| 32 GB | RAM | 64 GB |
| 480 GB SSD + 1 TB HDD | Storage | N/A Storage |
