Key Differences
In short — Megaport outperforms the cheaper GameMachines Cube - on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing GameMachines Cube - is a better bang for your buck.
Advantages of Megaport PC
- Performs up to 85% better in Death Stranding than GameMachines Cube - - 228 vs 123 FPS
Advantages of GameMachines Cube - Gaming PC
- Up to 52% cheaper than Megaport - €1279.0 vs €2649.0
- Up to 10% better value when playing Death Stranding than Megaport - €10.4 vs €11.62 per FPS
Death Stranding
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Buy for €2,649 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 462 minutes ago
2nd Variation
FPS
123
53%
Value, €/FPS
€10.4/FPS
100%
Price, €
€1279
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €1,279 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 464 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
4th Variation
2nd Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
4th Variation
GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER
16 GB GDDR6X | 256-bit
Pixel Fillrate
285.6 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
816 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
2nd Variation
GeForce RTX 4060
8 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
118.1 GPixel/s
41%
Texel Fillrate
236.2 GTexel/s
28%
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
4th Variation
Core i9-14900KF
3.2 GHz | 24-core
Single-Core
3108
100%
Multi-Core
21042
100%
CPU Winner
2nd Variation
Core i7-12700F
2.1 GHz | 12-core
Single-Core
2362
75%
Multi-Core
11527
54%
Megaport PC | vs | GameMachines Cube - Gaming PC |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
| Core i9-14900KF | CPU | Core i7-12700F |
| GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER | GPU | GeForce RTX 4060 |
| 16 GB | RAM | 16 GB |
| N/A Storage | Storage | N/A Storage |
