Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Megaport outperforms the cheaper GameMachines Cube - on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck!
Advantages of Megaport Gaming PC
- Performs up to 105% better in Total War: WARHAMMER III than GameMachines Cube - - 125 vs 61 FPS
- Up to 36% better value when playing Total War: WARHAMMER III than GameMachines Cube - - €14.23 vs €22.11 per FPS
Advantages of GameMachines Cube - Gaming PC
- Up to 24% cheaper than Megaport - €1349.00 vs €1779.00
Total War: WARHAMMER III
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
56th Variation
FPS
125
100%
Value, €/FPS
€14.23/FPS
100%
Price, €
€1779
75%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €1,779 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 399 minutes ago
Buy for €1,349 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 395 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
56th Variation
6th Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
56th Variation
GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER
12 GB GDDR6X | 192-bit
Pixel Fillrate
198 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
554.4 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
6th Variation
GeForce RTX 4060
8 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
118.1 GPixel/s
60%
Texel Fillrate
236.2 GTexel/s
43%
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
56th Variation
Ryzen 7 7700X
4.5 GHz | 8-core
Single-Core
2908
100%
Multi-Core
15263
100%
CPU Winner
6th Variation
Core i7-12700KF
3.6 GHz | 12-core
Single-Core
2526
87%
Multi-Core
13549
89%
Megaport Gaming PC | vs | GameMachines Cube - Gaming PC |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
| Ryzen 7 7700X | CPU | Core i7-12700KF |
| GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER | GPU | GeForce RTX 4060 |
32 GB | RAM | 16 GB |
| N/A Storage | Storage | N/A Storage |
