Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Megaport outperforms the cheaper Captiva on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck!
Advantages of Megaport Gaming PC
- Performs up to 51% better in Counter-Strike 2 than Captiva - 250 vs 166 FPS
- Up to 2% better value when playing Counter-Strike 2 than Captiva - €11.20 vs €11.38 per FPS
Advantages of Captiva PC
- Up to 33% cheaper than Megaport - €1889.00 vs €2799.00
Counter-Strike 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
55th Variation
FPS
250
100%
Value, €/FPS
€11.2/FPS
100%
Price, €
€2799
67%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €2,799 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 5070 minutes ago
Buy for €1,889 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 5075 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
55th Variation
4th Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
55th Variation
GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER
16 GB GDDR6X | 256-bit
Pixel Fillrate
285.6 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
816 GTexel/s
100%
4th Variation
GeForce RTX 4070
12 GB GDDR6X | 192-bit
Pixel Fillrate
158.4 GPixel/s
55%
Texel Fillrate
455.4 GTexel/s
56%
GPU Winner
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
4th Variation
Core i9-12900KF
3.2 GHz | 16-core
Single-Core
2608
100%
Multi-Core
15118
100%
CPU Winner
Megaport Gaming PC | vs | Captiva PC |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
| Ryzen 9 5900X | CPU | Core i9-12900KF |
| GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER | GPU | GeForce RTX 4070 |
| 64 GB | RAM | 64 GB |
| N/A Storage | Storage | N/A Storage |
