Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Megaport outperforms the cheaper shinobee High End on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck!
Advantages of Megaport Gaming PC
- Performs up to 114% better in Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II than shinobee High End - 122 vs 57 FPS
- Up to 22% better value when playing Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II than shinobee High End - €10.89 vs €14.02 per FPS
Advantages of shinobee High End Gaming PC
- Up to 40% cheaper than Megaport - €799.0 vs €1329.0
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
5th Variation
FPS
122
100%
Value, €/FPS
€10.89/FPS
100%
Price, €
€1329
60%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €1,329 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 136 minutes ago
Buy for €799 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 152 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
5th Variation
1st Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
5th Variation
GeForce RTX 4070
12 GB GDDR6X | 192-bit
Pixel Fillrate
158.4 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
455.4 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
1st Variation
GeForce RTX 3060
12 GB GDDR6 | 192-bit
Pixel Fillrate
85.3 GPixel/s
53%
Texel Fillrate
199 GTexel/s
43%
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
5th Variation
Core i9-11900KF
3.5 GHz | 8-core
Single-Core
2317
100%
Multi-Core
10125
100%
CPU Winner
1st Variation
Ryzen 7 5700X
3.4 GHz | 8-core
Single-Core
2121
91%
Multi-Core
9729
96%
Megaport Gaming PC | vs | shinobee High End Gaming PC |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
| Core i9-11900KF | CPU | Ryzen 7 5700X |
| GeForce RTX 4070 | GPU | GeForce RTX 3060 |
| 16 GB | RAM | 16 GB |
| N/A Storage | Storage | N/A Storage |
