Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Megaport outperforms Memory on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck!
Advantages of Megaport Gaming PC
- Performs up to 24% better in No Man's Sky than Memory - 169 vs 136 FPS
- Up to 20% better value when playing No Man's Sky than Memory - €6.62 vs €8.23 per FPS
No Man's Sky
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
40th Variation
FPS
169
100%
Value, €/FPS
€6.62/FPS
100%
Price, €
€1119
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €1,119 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 166 minutes ago
228th Variation
FPS
136
80.4733727810651%
Value, €/FPS
€8.23/FPS
80.4374240583232%
Price, €
€1119
100%
Buy for €1,119 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 178 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
40th Variation
228th Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
40th Variation
GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER
12 GB GDDR6X | 192-bit
Pixel Fillrate
198 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
554.4 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
228th Variation
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 8 GB
8 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
121.7 GPixel/s
61.464646464646464%
Texel Fillrate
344.8 GTexel/s
62.1933621933622%
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
40th Variation
Ryzen 5 5600
3.5 GHz | 6-core
Single-Core
2029
96.9885277246654%
Multi-Core
8539
98.61415867883127%
228th Variation
Ryzen 5 5600X
3.7 GHz | 6-core
Single-Core
2092
100%
Multi-Core
8659
100%
CPU Winner
Megaport Gaming PC | vs | Memory PC |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
| Ryzen 5 5600 | CPU | Ryzen 5 5600X |
| GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER | GPU | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 8 GB |
| 32 GB | RAM | 32 GB |
| N/A Storage | Storage | 512 GB SSD + 2 TB HDD |
