Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Megaport outperforms Kiebel on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck!
Advantages of Megaport Gaming PC
- Performs up to 27% better in Battlefield IV than Kiebel - 275 vs 216 FPS
- Up to 21% better value when playing Battlefield IV than Kiebel - €4.72 vs €6.01 per FPS
Battlefield IV
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
4th Variation
FPS
275
100%
Value, €/FPS
€4.72/FPS
100%
Price, €
€1299
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €1,299 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 184 minutes ago
Buy for €1,299 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 179 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
4th Variation
8th Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
4th Variation
GeForce RTX 4070
12 GB GDDR6X | 192-bit
Pixel Fillrate
158.4 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
455.4 GTexel/s
100%
8th Variation
GeForce RTX 4060
8 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
118.1 GPixel/s
75%
Texel Fillrate
236.2 GTexel/s
52%
GPU Winner
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
8th Variation
Core i9-11900KF
3.5 GHz | 8-core
Single-Core
2317
100%
Multi-Core
10125
100%
CPU Winner
Megaport Gaming PC | vs | Kiebel Gaming PC |
---|---|---|
Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
Ryzen 7 5700X | CPU | Core i9-11900KF |
GeForce RTX 4070 | GPU | GeForce RTX 4060 |
16 GB | RAM | 32 GB |
N/A Storage | Storage | 1 TB SSD |