Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Megaport outperforms the cheaper Ankermann Business V2 Work on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck!
Advantages of Megaport Gaming PC
- Performs up to 119% better in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Ankermann Business V2 Work - 68 vs 31 FPS
- Up to 31% better value when playing Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Ankermann Business V2 Work - €15.57 vs €22.55 per FPS
Advantages of Ankermann Business V2 Work Desktop PC
- Up to 34% cheaper than Megaport - €699.0 vs €1059.0
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
37th Variation
FPS
68
100%
Value, €/FPS
€15.57/FPS
100%
Price, €
€1059
66%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €1,059 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74732 minutes ago
FPS
31
45.588235294117645%
Value, €/FPS
€22.55/FPS
69.04656319290466%
Price, €
€699
100%
Buy for €699 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74740 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
37th Variation
GeForce RTX 4060
8 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
118.1 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
236.2 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
GeForce GT 710
1 GB DDR3 | 64-bit
Pixel Fillrate
1.62 GPixel/s
1.371718882303133%
Texel Fillrate
6.48 GTexel/s
2.743437764606266%
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
37th Variation
Core i7-11700F
2.5 GHz | 8-core
Single-Core
2101
100%
Multi-Core
8790
100%
CPU Winner
Megaport Gaming PC | vs | Ankermann Business V2 Work Desktop PC |
---|---|---|
Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
Core i7-11700F | CPU | Core i7-10700F |
GeForce RTX 4060 | GPU | GeForce GT 710 |
32 GB | RAM | 32 GB |
N/A Storage | Storage | N/A Storage |