Key Differences
In short — Megaport outperforms the cheaper ERAZER Engineer X30 High-End on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing ERAZER Engineer X30 High-End is a better bang for your buck.
Advantages of Megaport Gaming PC
- Performs up to 26% better in The Last of Us Part I than ERAZER Engineer X30 High-End - 117 vs 93 FPS
Advantages of ERAZER Engineer X30 High-End Gaming Desktop PC
- Up to 23% cheaper than Megaport - €1699.95 vs €2199.0
- Up to 3% better value when playing The Last of Us Part I than Megaport - €18.28 vs €18.79 per FPS
The Last of Us Part I
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
35th Variation
FPS
117
100%
Value, €/FPS
€18.79/FPS
97.28579031399683%
Price, €
€2199
77%
FPS Winner
Buy for €2,199 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1618 minutes ago
3rd Variation
FPS
93
79.48717948717949%
Value, €/FPS
€18.28/FPS
100%
Price, €
€1699.95
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €1,699.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2397 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
35th Variation
3rd Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
35th Variation
GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER
16 GB | System-Shared
Pixel Fillrate
285.6 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
816 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
3rd Variation
GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER
12 GB | System-Shared
Pixel Fillrate
198 GPixel/s
69.32773109243698%
Texel Fillrate
554.4 GTexel/s
67.94117647058823%
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
35th Variation
Core i9-12900F
null-core
Single-Core
2539
91.49549549549549%
Multi-Core
13890
80.14078006000462%
3rd Variation
Core i7-14700F
null-core
Single-Core
2775
100%
Multi-Core
17332
100%
CPU Winner
Megaport Gaming PC | vs | ERAZER Engineer X30 High-End Gaming Desktop PC |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
| Core i9-12900F | CPU | Core i7-14700F |
| GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER | GPU | GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER |
| 16 GB | RAM | 16 GB |
| N/A Storage | Storage | 2 TB SSD |
