Key Differences
In short — Megaport outperforms the cheaper Memory on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Memory is a better bang for your buck.
Advantages of Megaport Gaming PC
- Performs up to 125% better in F1 23 than Memory - 257 vs 114 FPS
Advantages of Memory PC
- Up to 69% cheaper than Megaport - €679.0 vs €2179.0
- Up to 30% better value when playing F1 23 than Megaport - €5.96 vs €8.48 per FPS
F1 23
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
34th Variation
FPS
257
100%
Value, €/FPS
€8.48/FPS
70.28301886792453%
Price, €
€2179
31%
FPS Winner
Buy for €2,179 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3702 minutes ago
346th Variation
FPS
114
44.3579766536965%
Value, €/FPS
€5.96/FPS
100%
Price, €
€679
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €679 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3699 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
34th Variation
346th Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
34th Variation
GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER
16 GB | System-Shared
Pixel Fillrate
285.6 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
816 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
346th Variation
GeForce GTX 1650
4 GB | System-Shared
Pixel Fillrate
53.28 GPixel/s
18.655462184873947%
Texel Fillrate
93.24 GTexel/s
11.426470588235293%
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
34th Variation
Core i9-12900KF
null-core
Single-Core
2542
100%
Multi-Core
14881
100%
CPU Winner
346th Variation
Ryzen 7 5700X
null-core
Single-Core
2121
83.43823760818253%
Multi-Core
9729
65.37867078825347%
Megaport Gaming PC | vs | Memory PC |
---|---|---|
Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
Core i9-12900KF | CPU | Ryzen 7 5700X |
GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER | GPU | GeForce GTX 1650 |
32 GB | RAM | 16 GB |
N/A Storage | Storage | 240 GB SSD + 2 TB HDD |