Key Differences
In short — Captiva outperforms the cheaper Megaport on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Megaport is a better bang for your buck.
Advantages of Megaport Gaming PC
- Up to 45% cheaper than Captiva - €1279.0 vs €2309.0
- Up to 36% better value when playing Sea of Thieves than Captiva - €6.21 vs €9.66 per FPS
Advantages of Captiva PC
- Performs up to 16% better in Sea of Thieves than Megaport - 239 vs 206 FPS
Sea of Thieves
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Mythical
32nd Variation
FPS
206
86.19246861924687%
Value, €/FPS
€6.21/FPS
100%
Price, €
€1279
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €1,279 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 76485 minutes ago
Buy for €2,309 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 76487 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Mythical
32nd Variation
6th Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
32nd Variation
GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER
12 GB GDDR6X | 192-bit
Pixel Fillrate
198 GPixel/s
94.82758620689654%
Texel Fillrate
554.4 GTexel/s
88.50574712643679%
6th Variation
GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
12 GB GDDR6X | 192-bit
Pixel Fillrate
208.8 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
626.4 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
32nd Variation
Ryzen 7 5700X
3.4 GHz | 8-core
Single-Core
2121
71.29411764705881%
Multi-Core
9729
50.58230217323489%
6th Variation
Core i7-14700KF
3.4 GHz | 20-core
Single-Core
2975
100%
Multi-Core
19234
100%
CPU Winner
Megaport Gaming PC | vs | Captiva PC |
---|---|---|
Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
Ryzen 7 5700X | CPU | Core i7-14700KF |
GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER | GPU | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti |
32 GB | RAM | 64 GB |
N/A Storage | Storage | N/A Storage |