Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Memory outperforms the more expensive Megaport on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck!
Advantages of Memory PC
- Performs up to 24% better in World of Tanks than Megaport - 207 vs 167 FPS
- Up to 12% cheaper than Megaport - €679.0 vs €769.0
- Up to 29% better value when playing World of Tanks than Megaport - €3.28 vs €4.6 per FPS
World of Tanks
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for €769 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 874 minutes ago
Buy for €679 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 871 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
3rd Variation
349th Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
3rd Variation
Radeon RX 6600
8 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
159.4 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
279 GTexel/s
79%
349th Variation
Radeon RX 6700
10 GB GDDR6 | 160-bit
Pixel Fillrate
156.8 GPixel/s
98%
Texel Fillrate
352.8 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
3rd Variation
Ryzen 5 5600G
3.9 GHz | 6-core
Single-Core
1918
100%
Multi-Core
7665
99%
CPU Winner
Megaport Gaming PC | vs | Memory PC |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
| Ryzen 5 5600G | CPU | Ryzen 5 5500 |
| Radeon RX 6600 | GPU | Radeon RX 6700 |
| 16 GB | RAM | 16 GB |
| N/A Storage | Storage | N/A Storage |
