Key Differences
In short — Megaport outperforms Memory on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both PC Builds to compare value.
Advantages of Megaport Gaming PC
- Performs up to 287% better in No Man's Sky than Memory - 209 vs 54 FPS
No Man's Sky
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
28th Variation
FPS
209
100%
Value, €/FPS
€10.14/FPS
100%
Price, €
€2119
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €2,119 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 626 minutes ago
Currently Out of Stock
Out of Stock
Updated 626 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
28th Variation
433rd Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
28th Variation
GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER
16 GB GDDR6X | 256-bit
Pixel Fillrate
285.6 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
816 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
433rd Variation
GeForce GTX 1630
4 GB GDDR6 | 64-bit
Pixel Fillrate
28.56 GPixel/s
10%
Texel Fillrate
57.12 GTexel/s
7%
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
28th Variation
Ryzen 7 7700
3.8 GHz | 8-core
Single-Core
2854
100%
Multi-Core
14808
100%
CPU Winner
Megaport Gaming PC | vs | Memory PC |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
| Ryzen 7 7700 | CPU | Core i9-11900F |
| GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER | GPU | GeForce GTX 1630 |
| 32 GB | RAM | 32 GB |
| N/A Storage | Storage | 480 GB SSD + 2 TB HDD |
