Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Megaport outperforms the cheaper Mini on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck!
Advantages of Megaport Gaming PC
- Performs up to 329% better in World of Tanks than Mini - 390 vs 91 FPS
- Up to 8% better value when playing World of Tanks than Mini - €5.43 vs €5.88 per FPS
Advantages of Mini PC
- Up to 75% cheaper than Megaport - €534.65 vs €2119.0
World of Tanks
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
24th Variation
FPS
390
100%
Value, €/FPS
€5.43/FPS
100%
Price, €
€2119
25%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €2,119 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 51393 minutes ago
3rd Variation
FPS
91
23.333333333333332%
Value, €/FPS
€5.88/FPS
92.3469387755102%
Price, €
€534.65
100%
Buy for €534.65 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 51391 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
24th Variation
3rd Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
24th Variation
GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER
12 GB GDDR6X | 192-bit
Pixel Fillrate
198 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
554.4 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
3rd Variation
Radeon 680M
System-Shared | System-Shared
Pixel Fillrate
70.4 GPixel/s
35.55555555555556%
Texel Fillrate
105.6 GTexel/s
19.047619047619047%
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
24th Variation
Core i9-14900KF
3.2 GHz | 24-core
Single-Core
3108
100%
Multi-Core
21042
100%
CPU Winner
3rd Variation
Ryzen 9 6900HX
3.3 GHz | 8-core
Single-Core
1979
63.67438867438867%
Multi-Core
9532
45.299876437600986%
Megaport Gaming PC | vs | Mini PC |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
| Core i9-14900KF | CPU | Ryzen 9 6900HX |
| GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER | GPU | Radeon 680M |
| 32 GB | RAM | 32 GB |
| N/A Storage | Storage | N/A Storage |
