Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Megaport outperforms the cheaper Memory on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck!
Advantages of Megaport Gaming PC
- Performs up to 243% better in World of Tanks than Memory - 384 vs 112 FPS
- Up to 21% better value when playing World of Tanks than Memory - €4.76 vs €6.06 per FPS
Advantages of Memory PC
- Up to 63% cheaper than Megaport - €679.0 vs €1829.0
World of Tanks
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
23rd Variation
FPS
384
100%
Value, €/FPS
€4.76/FPS
100%
Price, €
€1829
37%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €1,829 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1732 minutes ago
346th Variation
FPS
112
29.166666666666668%
Value, €/FPS
€6.06/FPS
78.54785478547855%
Price, €
€679
100%
Buy for €679 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1734 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
23rd Variation
346th Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
23rd Variation
GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER
12 GB | System-Shared
Pixel Fillrate
198 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
554.4 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
346th Variation
GeForce GTX 1650
4 GB | System-Shared
Pixel Fillrate
53.28 GPixel/s
26.90909090909091%
Texel Fillrate
93.24 GTexel/s
16.818181818181817%
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
23rd Variation
Core i7-14700KF
null-core
Single-Core
2975
100%
Multi-Core
19234
100%
CPU Winner
346th Variation
Ryzen 7 5700X
null-core
Single-Core
2121
71.29411764705881%
Multi-Core
9729
50.58230217323489%
Megaport Gaming PC | vs | Memory PC |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
| Core i7-14700KF | CPU | Ryzen 7 5700X |
| GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER | GPU | GeForce GTX 1650 |
32 GB | RAM | 16 GB |
| N/A Storage | Storage | 240 GB SSD + 2 TB HDD |
