Key Differences
In short — Megaport outperforms the cheaper Memory on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Memory is a better bang for your buck.
Advantages of Megaport Gaming PC
- Performs up to 75% better in Counter-Strike 2 than Memory - 489 vs 279 FPS
Advantages of Memory PC
- Up to 45% cheaper than Megaport - €1019.00 vs €1839.00
- Up to 3% better value when playing Counter-Strike 2 than Megaport - €3.65 vs €3.76 per FPS
Counter-Strike 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Buy for €1,839 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 83 minutes ago
Buy for €1,019 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 95 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
23rd Variation
16th Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
23rd Variation
GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER
12 GB GDDR6X | 192-bit
Pixel Fillrate
198 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
554.4 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
16th Variation
GeForce RTX 3060
12 GB GDDR6 | 192-bit
Pixel Fillrate
85.3 GPixel/s
43%
Texel Fillrate
199 GTexel/s
36%
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
23rd Variation
Core i7-14700KF
3.4 GHz | 20-core
Single-Core
2975
100%
Multi-Core
19234
100%
CPU Winner
Megaport Gaming PC | vs | Memory PC |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
| Core i7-14700KF | CPU | Core i9-11900F |
| GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER | GPU | GeForce RTX 3060 |
| 32 GB | RAM | 32 GB |
| N/A Storage | Storage | 512 GB SSD + 2 TB HDD |
