Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Megaport outperforms the cheaper Memory on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck!
Advantages of Megaport Gaming PC
- Performs up to 208% better in Tom Clancy's Ghost Recon Wildlands than Memory - 111 vs 36 FPS
- Up to 46% better value when playing Tom Clancy's Ghost Recon Wildlands than Memory - €10.26 vs €18.86 per FPS
Advantages of Memory PC
- Up to 40% cheaper than Megaport - €679.0 vs €1139.0
Tom Clancy's Ghost Recon Wildlands
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
19th Variation
FPS
111
100%
Value, €/FPS
€10.26/FPS
100%
Price, €
€1139
59%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €1,139 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 48 minutes ago
346th Variation
FPS
36
32.432432432432435%
Value, €/FPS
€18.86/FPS
54.40084835630965%
Price, €
€679
100%
Buy for €679 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 51 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
19th Variation
346th Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
19th Variation
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB
16 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
121.7 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
344.8 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
346th Variation
GeForce GTX 1650
4 GB GDDR5 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
53.28 GPixel/s
43.779786359901394%
Texel Fillrate
93.24 GTexel/s
27.04176334106728%
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
Megaport Gaming PC | vs | Memory PC |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
| Ryzen 7 5700X | CPU | Ryzen 7 5700X |
| GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB | GPU | GeForce GTX 1650 |
32 GB | RAM | 16 GB |
| N/A Storage | Storage | 240 GB SSD + 2 TB HDD |
