Key Differences
In short — Captiva outperforms the cheaper Megaport on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Megaport is a better bang for your buck.
Advantages of Megaport Gaming PC
- Up to 72% cheaper than Captiva - €1139.0 vs €4089.0
- Up to 35% better value when playing God of War than Captiva - €13.09 vs €20.24 per FPS
Advantages of Captiva PC
- Performs up to 132% better in God of War than Megaport - 202 vs 87 FPS
God of War
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
19th Variation
FPS
87
43.06930693069307%
Value, €/FPS
€13.09/FPS
100%
Price, €
€1139
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €1,139 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 4957 minutes ago
8th Variation
FPS
202
100%
Value, €/FPS
€20.24/FPS
64.67391304347827%
Price, €
€4089
27%
FPS Winner
Buy for €4,089 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 5738 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
19th Variation
8th Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
19th Variation
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB
16 GB | System-Shared
Pixel Fillrate
121.7 GPixel/s
27.44081172491545%
Texel Fillrate
344.8 GTexel/s
26.72868217054264%
8th Variation
GeForce RTX 4090
24 GB | System-Shared
Pixel Fillrate
443.5 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
1290 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
19th Variation
Ryzen 7 5700X
null-core
Single-Core
2121
68.24324324324324%
Multi-Core
9729
46.23609923011121%
Megaport Gaming PC | vs | Captiva PC |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
| Ryzen 7 5700X | CPU | Core i9-14900KF |
| GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB | GPU | GeForce RTX 4090 |
| 32 GB | RAM | 64 GB |
| N/A Storage | Storage | N/A Storage |
