Key Differences
In short — Megaport outperforms the cheaper Megaport on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Megaport is a better bang for your buck.
Advantages of Megaport Gaming PC
- Performs up to 5% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Megaport - 198 vs 188 FPS
Advantages of Megaport Gaming PC
- Up to 7% cheaper than Megaport - €2139.0 vs €2299.0
- Up to 2% better value when playing Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Megaport - €11.38 vs €11.61 per FPS
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
16th Variation
FPS
198
100%
Value, €/FPS
€11.61/FPS
98.01894918173988%
Price, €
€2299
93%
FPS Winner
Buy for €2,299 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74630 minutes ago
35th Variation
FPS
188
94.94949494949495%
Value, €/FPS
€11.38/FPS
100%
Price, €
€2139
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €2,139 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74632 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
16th Variation
35th Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
16th Variation
GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER
16 GB GDDR6X | 256-bit
Pixel Fillrate
285.6 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
816 GTexel/s
100%
35th Variation
GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER
16 GB GDDR6X | 256-bit
Pixel Fillrate
285.6 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
816 GTexel/s
100%
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
16th Variation
Core i7-14700KF
3.4 GHz | 20-core
Single-Core
2975
100%
Multi-Core
19234
100%
CPU Winner
35th Variation
Core i9-12900F
2.4 GHz | 16-core
Single-Core
2539
85.34453781512606%
Multi-Core
13890
72.21586773422065%
Megaport Gaming PC | vs | Megaport Gaming PC |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
| Core i7-14700KF | CPU | Core i9-12900F |
| GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER | GPU | GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER |
| 16 GB | RAM | 16 GB |
| N/A Storage | Storage | N/A Storage |
