Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Megaport outperforms the more expensive Captiva on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck!
Advantages of Megaport Gaming PC
- Performs up to 15% better in Dead Space than Captiva - 140 vs 122 FPS
- Up to 14% cheaper than Captiva - €2349.0 vs €2729.0
- Up to 25% better value when playing Dead Space than Captiva - €16.78 vs €22.37 per FPS
Dead Space
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
16th Variation
FPS
140
100%
Value, €/FPS
€16.78/FPS
100%
Price, €
€2349
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €2,349 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1906 minutes ago
Buy for €2,729 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1907 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
16th Variation
5th Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
16th Variation
GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER
16 GB GDDR6X | 256-bit
Pixel Fillrate
285.6 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
816 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
5th Variation
GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
12 GB GDDR6X | 192-bit
Pixel Fillrate
208.8 GPixel/s
73%
Texel Fillrate
626.4 GTexel/s
76%
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
16th Variation
Core i7-14700KF
3.4 GHz | 20-core
Single-Core
2975
95%
Multi-Core
19234
91%
5th Variation
Core i9-14900KF
3.2 GHz | 24-core
Single-Core
3108
100%
Multi-Core
21042
100%
CPU Winner
Megaport Gaming PC | vs | Captiva PC |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
| Core i7-14700KF | CPU | Core i9-14900KF |
| GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER | GPU | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti |
| 16 GB | RAM | 64 GB |
| N/A Storage | Storage | N/A Storage |
