Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Megaport outperforms the more expensive Memory on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck!
Advantages of Megaport Gaming PC
- Performs up to 5% better in No Man's Sky than Memory - 105 vs 100 FPS
- Up to 4% cheaper than Memory - €799.0 vs €829.0
- Up to 8% better value when playing No Man's Sky than Memory - €7.61 vs €8.29 per FPS
No Man's Sky
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
14th Variation
FPS
105
100%
Value, €/FPS
€7.61/FPS
100%
Price, €
€799
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €799 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 4914 minutes ago
17th Variation
FPS
100
95.23809523809523%
Value, €/FPS
€8.29/FPS
91.79734620024126%
Price, €
€829
96%
Buy for €829 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 4926 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
14th Variation
17th Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
14th Variation
GeForce RTX 4060
8 GB | System-Shared
Pixel Fillrate
118.1 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
236.2 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
17th Variation
GeForce RTX 3060
12 GB | System-Shared
Pixel Fillrate
85.3 GPixel/s
72.22692633361558%
Texel Fillrate
199 GTexel/s
84.2506350550381%
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
14th Variation
Ryzen 5 4500
null-core
Single-Core
1555
83.11063602351683%
Multi-Core
6199
80.59022360894436%
Megaport Gaming PC | vs | Memory PC |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
| Ryzen 5 4500 | CPU | Ryzen 5 5500 |
| GeForce RTX 4060 | GPU | GeForce RTX 3060 |
| 16 GB | RAM | 32 GB |
| N/A Storage | Storage | 512 GB SSD + 2 TB HDD |
