Key Differences
In short — Captiva outperforms the cheaper Megaport on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Megaport is a better bang for your buck.
Advantages of Megaport Gaming PC
- Up to 80% cheaper than Captiva - €799.0 vs €4089.0
- Up to 25% better value when playing Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II than Captiva - €13.1 vs €17.47 per FPS
Advantages of Captiva PC
- Performs up to 284% better in Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II than Megaport - 234 vs 61 FPS
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
14th Variation
FPS
61
26.06837606837607%
Value, €/FPS
€13.1/FPS
100%
Price, €
€799
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €799 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1720 minutes ago
8th Variation
FPS
234
100%
Value, €/FPS
€17.47/FPS
74.98568975386377%
Price, €
€4089
19%
FPS Winner
Buy for €4,089 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2500 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
14th Variation
8th Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
14th Variation
GeForce RTX 4060
8 GB | System-Shared
Pixel Fillrate
118.1 GPixel/s
26.62908680947012%
Texel Fillrate
236.2 GTexel/s
18.310077519379846%
8th Variation
GeForce RTX 4090
24 GB | System-Shared
Pixel Fillrate
443.5 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
1290 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
14th Variation
Ryzen 5 4500
null-core
Single-Core
1555
50.03217503217503%
Multi-Core
6199
29.460127364318982%
Megaport Gaming PC | vs | Captiva PC |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
| Ryzen 5 4500 | CPU | Core i9-14900KF |
| GeForce RTX 4060 | GPU | GeForce RTX 4090 |
| 16 GB | RAM | 64 GB |
| N/A Storage | Storage | N/A Storage |
