Key Differences
In short — Megaport outperforms the cheaper Kiebel on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Kiebel is a better bang for your buck.
Advantages of Megaport Gaming PC
- Performs up to 86% better in FINAL FANTASY XIV: Endwalker than Kiebel - 264 vs 142 FPS
Advantages of Kiebel Gaming PC
- Up to 58% cheaper than Megaport - €1029.0 vs €2449.0
- Up to 22% better value when playing FINAL FANTASY XIV: Endwalker than Megaport - €7.25 vs €9.28 per FPS
FINAL FANTASY XIV: Endwalker
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Buy for €2,449 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1624 minutes ago
15th Variation
FPS
142
53.78787878787878%
Value, €/FPS
€7.25/FPS
100%
Price, €
€1029
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €1,029 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2404 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
12th Variation
15th Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
12th Variation
GeForce RTX 4080
16 GB | System-Shared
Pixel Fillrate
280.6 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
761.5 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
15th Variation
GeForce RTX 4060
8 GB | System-Shared
Pixel Fillrate
118.1 GPixel/s
42.088382038488945%
Texel Fillrate
236.2 GTexel/s
31.0177281680893%
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
12th Variation
Ryzen 9 7950X
null-core
Single-Core
2938
100%
Multi-Core
19293
100%
CPU Winner
15th Variation
Ryzen 9 5900X
null-core
Single-Core
2179
74.16609938733832%
Multi-Core
11883
61.592287358109154%
Megaport Gaming PC | vs | Kiebel Gaming PC |
---|---|---|
Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
Ryzen 9 7950X | CPU | Ryzen 9 5900X |
GeForce RTX 4080 | GPU | GeForce RTX 4060 |
32 GB | RAM | 32 GB |
N/A Storage | Storage | 1 TB SSD |