Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Memory outperforms the more expensive MEDION ERAZER Recon E10 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck!
Advantages of Memory PC
- Performs up to 70% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than MEDION ERAZER Recon E10 - 107 vs 63 FPS
- Up to 3% cheaper than MEDION ERAZER Recon E10 - €1159.00 vs €1189.00
- Up to 43% better value when playing Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than MEDION ERAZER Recon E10 - €10.83 vs €18.87 per FPS
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
2nd Variation
FPS
63
59%
Value, €/FPS
€18.87/FPS
57%
Price, €
€1189
97%
Buy for €1,189 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 268 minutes ago
Buy for €1,159 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 265 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
2nd Variation
228th Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
2nd Variation
GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER
6 GB GDDR6 | 192-bit
Pixel Fillrate
85.68 GPixel/s
70%
Texel Fillrate
157.1 GTexel/s
46%
GPU Winner
228th Variation
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 8 GB
8 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
121.7 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
344.8 GTexel/s
100%
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
2nd Variation
Core i5-12400
2.5 GHz | 6-core
Single-Core
2179
100%
Multi-Core
8847
100%
CPU Winner
MEDION ERAZER Recon E10 Gaming Desktop PC | vs | Memory PC |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
| Core i5-12400 | CPU | Ryzen 5 5600X |
| GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER | GPU | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 8 GB |
| 16 GB | RAM | 32 GB |
| 1 TB SSD | Storage | 512 GB SSD + 2 TB HDD |
