Key Differences
In short — MEDION ERAZER Hunter X25 High End outperforms the cheaper Megaport on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Megaport is a better bang for your buck.
Advantages of MEDION ERAZER Hunter X25 High End Gaming Desktop PC
- Performs up to 6% better in World of Tanks than Megaport - 328 vs 309 FPS
Advantages of Megaport Gaming PC
- Up to 50% cheaper than MEDION ERAZER Hunter X25 High End - €1499.0 vs €2999.0
- Up to 47% better value when playing World of Tanks than MEDION ERAZER Hunter X25 High End - €4.85 vs €9.14 per FPS
World of Tanks
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
FPS
328
100%
Value, €/FPS
€9.14/FPS
53.06345733041575%
Price, €
€2999
49%
FPS Winner
Buy for €2,999 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 979 minutes ago
31st Variation
FPS
309
94.20731707317073%
Value, €/FPS
€4.85/FPS
100%
Price, €
€1499
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €1,499 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 971 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
Radeon RX 6800 XT
16 GB GDDR6 | 256-bit
Pixel Fillrate
288 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
648 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
31st Variation
GeForce RTX 4070
12 GB GDDR6X | 192-bit
Pixel Fillrate
158.4 GPixel/s
55.00000000000001%
Texel Fillrate
455.4 GTexel/s
70.27777777777777%
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
31st Variation
Ryzen 9 5900X
3.7 GHz | 12-core
Single-Core
2179
100%
Multi-Core
11883
100%
MEDION ERAZER Hunter X25 High End Gaming Desktop PC | vs | Megaport Gaming PC |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
| Ryzen 9 5900X | CPU | Ryzen 9 5900X |
| Radeon RX 6800 XT | GPU | GeForce RTX 4070 |
| 16 GB | RAM | 32 GB |
| 1 TB SSD | Storage | N/A Storage |
