Key Differences
In short — MEDION ERAZER Hunter X25 High End outperforms the cheaper Megaport on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Megaport is a better bang for your buck.
Advantages of MEDION ERAZER Hunter X25 High End Gaming Desktop PC
- Performs up to 60% better in World of Tanks than Megaport - 328 vs 205 FPS
Advantages of Megaport Gaming PC
- Up to 70% cheaper than MEDION ERAZER Hunter X25 High End - €899.0 vs €2999.0
- Up to 52% better value when playing World of Tanks than MEDION ERAZER Hunter X25 High End - €4.39 vs €9.14 per FPS
World of Tanks
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
FPS
328
100%
Value, €/FPS
€9.14/FPS
48.03063457330415%
Price, €
€2999
29%
FPS Winner
Buy for €2,999 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 458 minutes ago
Buy for €899 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 457 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
Radeon RX 6800 XT
16 GB GDDR6 | 256-bit
Pixel Fillrate
288 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
648 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
2nd Variation
GeForce RTX 4060
8 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
118.1 GPixel/s
41.00694444444444%
Texel Fillrate
236.2 GTexel/s
36.45061728395061%
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
2nd Variation
Ryzen 5 5600
3.5 GHz | 6-core
Single-Core
2029
93.11610830656264%
Multi-Core
8539
71.8589581755449%
MEDION ERAZER Hunter X25 High End Gaming Desktop PC | vs | Megaport Gaming PC |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
| Ryzen 9 5900X | CPU | Ryzen 5 5600 |
| Radeon RX 6800 XT | GPU | GeForce RTX 4060 |
| 16 GB | RAM | 16 GB |
| 1 TB SSD | Storage | N/A Storage |
