Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Captiva outperforms the more expensive MEDION ERAZER Hunter X25 High End on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck!
Advantages of Captiva PC
- Performs up to 25% better in The Last of Us Part I than MEDION ERAZER Hunter X25 High End - 101 vs 81 FPS
- Up to 25% cheaper than MEDION ERAZER Hunter X25 High End - €2309.0 vs €3099.0
- Up to 40% better value when playing The Last of Us Part I than MEDION ERAZER Hunter X25 High End - €22.86 vs €38.26 per FPS
The Last of Us Part I
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
FPS
81
80.19801980198021%
Value, €/FPS
€38.26/FPS
59.749085206481965%
Price, €
€3099
74%
Buy for €3,099 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74937 minutes ago
Buy for €2,309 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74928 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
6th Variation
GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
12 GB GDDR6X | 192-bit
Pixel Fillrate
208.8 GPixel/s
72.50000000000001%
Texel Fillrate
626.4 GTexel/s
96.66666666666667%
GPU Winner
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
6th Variation
Core i7-14700KF
3.4 GHz | 20-core
Single-Core
2975
100%
Multi-Core
19234
100%
CPU Winner
MEDION ERAZER Hunter X25 High End Gaming Desktop PC | vs | Captiva PC |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
| Ryzen 9 5900X | CPU | Core i7-14700KF |
| Radeon RX 6800 XT | GPU | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti |
| 16 GB | RAM | 64 GB |
| 1 TB SSD | Storage | N/A Storage |
