Key Differences
In short — MEDION ERAZER Hunter X20 High End outperforms the cheaper Memory on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Memory is a better bang for your buck.
Advantages of MEDION ERAZER Hunter X20 High End Gaming Desktop PC
- Performs up to 116% better in Counter-Strike 2 than Memory - 361 vs 167 FPS
Advantages of Memory PC
- Up to 81% cheaper than MEDION ERAZER Hunter X20 High End - €629.00 vs €3399.00
- Up to 60% better value when playing Counter-Strike 2 than MEDION ERAZER Hunter X20 High End - €3.77 vs €9.42 per FPS
Counter-Strike 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
2nd Variation
FPS
361
100%
Value, €/FPS
€9.42/FPS
40%
Price, €
€3399
18%
FPS Winner
Buy for €3,399 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2699 minutes ago
Buy for €629 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2692 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
2nd Variation
366th Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
2nd Variation
GeForce RTX 3080
10 GB GDDR6X | 320-bit
Pixel Fillrate
164.2 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
465.1 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
366th Variation
Radeon RX 6500 XT
4 GB GDDR6 | 64-bit
Pixel Fillrate
90.08 GPixel/s
55%
Texel Fillrate
180.2 GTexel/s
39%
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
2nd Variation
Core i7-11700KF
3.6 GHz | 8-core
Single-Core
2257
100%
Multi-Core
10185
100%
CPU Winner
MEDION ERAZER Hunter X20 High End Gaming Desktop PC | vs | Memory PC |
---|---|---|
Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
Core i7-11700KF | CPU | Ryzen 5 3600 |
GeForce RTX 3080 | GPU | Radeon RX 6500 XT |
10 GB | RAM | 16 GB |
2 TB SSD | Storage | N/A Storage |