Key Differences
In short — MEDION ERAZER outperforms the cheaper Kiebel on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Kiebel is a better bang for your buck.
Advantages of MEDION ERAZER Gaming PC
- Performs up to 6% better in The Last of Us Part I than Kiebel - 54 vs 51 FPS
Advantages of Kiebel Gaming PC
- Up to 7% cheaper than MEDION ERAZER - €1299.00 vs €1399.00
- Up to 2% better value when playing The Last of Us Part I than MEDION ERAZER - €25.47 vs €25.91 per FPS
The Last of Us Part I
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for €1,399 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 8794 minutes ago
Buy for €1,299 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 8784 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
8th Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
8 GB GDDR6 | 256-bit
Pixel Fillrate
133.2 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
253.1 GTexel/s
100%
8th Variation
GeForce RTX 4060
8 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
118.1 GPixel/s
89%
Texel Fillrate
236.2 GTexel/s
93%
GPU Winner
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
8th Variation
Core i9-11900KF
3.5 GHz | 8-core
Single-Core
2317
100%
Multi-Core
10125
94%
CPU Winner
MEDION ERAZER Gaming PC | vs | Kiebel Gaming PC |
---|---|---|
Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
Core i7-12700 | CPU | Core i9-11900KF |
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | GPU | GeForce RTX 4060 |
16 GB | RAM | 32 GB |
1 TB SSD | Storage | 1 TB SSD |