Key Differences
In short — MEDION ERAZER Engineer X20 High End outperforms the cheaper Memory on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Memory is a better bang for your buck.
Advantages of MEDION ERAZER Engineer X20 High End Gaming Desktop PC
- Performs up to 13% better in No Man's Sky than Memory - 141 vs 125 FPS
Advantages of Memory PC
- Up to 21% cheaper than MEDION ERAZER Engineer X20 High End - €1189.0 vs €1499.0
- Up to 11% better value when playing No Man's Sky than MEDION ERAZER Engineer X20 High End - €9.51 vs €10.63 per FPS
No Man's Sky
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
FPS
141
100%
Value, €/FPS
€10.63/FPS
89%
Price, €
€1499
79%
FPS Winner
Buy for €1,499 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1821 minutes ago
Buy for €1,189 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1808 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
418th Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
GeForce RTX 3070
8 GB GDDR6 | 256-bit
Pixel Fillrate
165.6 GPixel/s
98%
Texel Fillrate
317.4 GTexel/s
94%
GPU Winner
418th Variation
Radeon RX 6650 XT
8 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
168.6 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
337.3 GTexel/s
100%
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
418th Variation
Core i7-12700K
3.6 GHz | 12-core
Single-Core
2531
100%
Multi-Core
13694
100%
CPU Winner
MEDION ERAZER Engineer X20 High End Gaming Desktop PC | vs | Memory PC |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
| Core i7-12700 | CPU | Core i7-12700K |
| GeForce RTX 3070 | GPU | Radeon RX 6650 XT |
| 16 GB | RAM | 32 GB |
| 1 TB SSD | Storage | 512 GB SSD + 2 TB HDD |
