Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Kiebel outperforms the more expensive MEDION ERAZER Engineer E10 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck!
Advantages of Kiebel Gaming PC
- Performs up to 35% better in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than MEDION ERAZER Engineer E10 - 69 vs 51 FPS
- Up to 14% cheaper than MEDION ERAZER Engineer E10 - €1029.0 vs €1199.0
- Up to 37% better value when playing Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than MEDION ERAZER Engineer E10 - €14.91 vs €23.51 per FPS
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
1st Variation
FPS
51
73.91304347826086%
Value, €/FPS
€23.51/FPS
63.4198213526159%
Price, €
€1199
85%
Buy for €1,199 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 5075 minutes ago
15th Variation
FPS
69
100%
Value, €/FPS
€14.91/FPS
100%
Price, €
€1029
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €1,029 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 5845 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
1st Variation
15th Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
1st Variation
GeForce GTX 1650
4 GB | System-Shared
Pixel Fillrate
53.28 GPixel/s
45.114309906858594%
Texel Fillrate
93.24 GTexel/s
39.475021168501264%
15th Variation
GeForce RTX 4060
8 GB | System-Shared
Pixel Fillrate
118.1 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
236.2 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
1st Variation
Core i5-12400
null-core
Single-Core
2179
100%
Multi-Core
8847
74.45089623832366%
MEDION ERAZER Engineer E10 Gaming PC | vs | Kiebel Gaming PC |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
| Core i5-12400 | CPU | Ryzen 9 5900X |
| GeForce GTX 1650 | GPU | GeForce RTX 4060 |
| 16 GB | RAM | 32 GB |
| 512 GB SSD | Storage | 1 TB SSD |
